|
A SINGLE STATE SOLUTION
|
Tuesday, 16 January 2007 Zionism can now be defined as the political movement which wraps and camouflages itself in the Jewish faith, having as its primary mission the destruction of all sovereign national governments, religions and social structures with the objective of removing these obstacles to the establishment of a one world global government: the "New World Order." Zionism is also the belief in the "Jewish" state, the primary one being the United States, and of secondary significance, the state of Israel. The latter will serve as the "trigger" to provoke World War III by inciting belligerent political and religious interests in the Middle East to war against each other. Thus, by taking advantage of the competing hostile religious and political divides in the region, the military chaos that could be launched and the horrific world war that would follow, leaves but only one way out for the human race. Mankind will then come to realize that its salvation can come only through a beneficent New World Order government. Predecessors of the NWO are, of course, The League of Nations and the UN. The Zionist agenda can be attributed as the chief contributing causal factors behind virtually every war on the planet since 1776, especially those involving US. And although it was a revelation, when only a short time ago I first came to realize the Zionist fingerprints all over our very own American Revolution and nation's first war, I am now aware of Zionism's continued and intensified involvement in our second war, the War of 1812. In fact, all our wars after 1776 were not only engineered by Zionists, but can also be shown to be interconnected to each other via the cult of powerful international Zionist bankers. The Zionist bankers, headed by the international House of Rothschild-Rockefeller, have deliberately incited global conflicts and then made astonishing profits funding both sides of the conflicts they created. Zionism can be shown to be a product of Jewish origin, and these origins have been "thoroughly studied" by Professor Kevin MacDonald, a psychologist at Cal-State. He briefly articulates the origins of Zionism using the presently accepted and politically correct euphemism of "neoconservatism." As MacDonald has offered in his September 18, 2003 essay, written for V-Dare.com entitled, "Thinking About Neoconservatism," he states, "there is nothing conservative about their goals." I would hasten to add that there is nothing new about their agenda either; nor is their agenda in any way shape or form "American." It is called neoconservatism, but it is really one thing only: Zionism! And there is authoritative source material that offers viable arguments that Zionist Jews aren't really Jews at all, but an Asiatic race originating from a land formerly identified as Khazar in the country known today as Georgia. The population was "converted" to Judaism merely because their king had converted in 720 A.D. Zionism, through its founder, Theodor Herzl, charges Jews with his vision as offered in his book "The Jewish State" (1896): "We are one people!" What is meant by this is that although Jewish people may have divergent interests, backgrounds and goals, Zionism charges all Jews to put their differences behind themrecognizing that they are different from all other people. This serves to create the double-edge sword that is Zionism; 1) all Jews are both Zionists and Jews; and 2) Jews are a race, thereby justifying the charge of "racism" to be used against anyone and everyone who questions Zionism. It justifies the use of the racist term "anti-Semite." But Zionism is not a religion; it is a political agenda. Political agendas are normally the product of a state, or at least are intended to result in state action. The latter characteristic approach launching political agendas via state mandate is usually the product of a secret, or powerful and possibly even a dangerous cabal that represents only the interests of their own group. This is usually in conflict with the best interests of either the national population, or possibly Mankind in general. Zionism defends itself against its critics with racist-based charges of anti-Semitism purely because Zionists reserve for themselves the right to hide behind their adopted sovereignty of being a "nation" of people and the nation of "Israel." They offer that all Jews are a nation, but when convenient or deemed necessary, they invoke their "religion" to stave off criticism and analytical inquiry. Are Jews BOTH a race and a religion? Is there such a thing as the "Protestant Race," or the "Catholic Race"? Can there be, therefore, such a thing as the "Jewish Race"? Depending upon the circumstances or the nature of inquiry or criticism, Zionists will either cry "religious persecution" or "racial discrimination" as a defense. These charges are consistently offered after they, Zionists, first perpetrate the persecution of others, and when it is they who first initiate racial discrimination towards others, most notably in the form of mass murder and acts of terrorism against the Palestinians and other Middle Eastern nations. They then cry anti-Semitism when questioned, defending their indefensible actions clearly recognized as such by the world. They insist that their "nation" has a right to exist, as they deny other nations that very same right. Examining further MacDonald's V-Dare piece, he provides a hyperlink promoting his book, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements. MacDonald promotes what I feel is the standard refutation of the connectivity of a Zionist conspiracy, when he offers as its basic defense the disparity of Jewish cultural and intellectual diversity and the resultant conflicting points of view. To be fair, I have not read either the book or any additional evaluation of the contents therein; but I focus on this vignette to make the point of the common error that is always resurrected to defeat the "conspiracy theory." MacDonald writes: "There is no implication here of a unified Jewish 'conspiracy' to undermine gentile culture, as portrayed in the notorious Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Since the Enlightenment, Judaism has never been a unified, monolithic movement, and there has clearly been a great deal of disagreement among Jews as to how to protect themselves and attain their interests during this period. The movements discussed in this volume (Boasian anthropology, political radicalism, psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School of Social Research, and the New York Intellectuals) were advanced by relatively few individuals whose views may not have been known or understood by the majority of the Jewish community. The argument is that Jews dominated these intellectual movements, that a strong sense of Jewish identity was characteristic of the great majority of these individuals, and that these individuals were pursuing a Jewish agenda in establishing and participating in these movements." MacDonald does not examine, at least as far as I am aware due to my ignorance of his total efforts, the connection between Mayer Rothschild, the patriarch of the Rothschild dynasty, and Adam Weisshaupt, the founder of a satanic cult calling themselves the "Illuminati." It is believed that Rothschild encouraged or plotted with Weisshaupt for the Illuminati's infiltration of the Freemasons. Rank and file Freemasons are unaware of the satanic aspect of their organization, yet the connection between the rich and powerful Rothschilds, Weisshaupt, the Freemasons and Zionism is foolish to ignore. And although the connection has been brought to the fore by such as Dr. Henry Makow, the term "Illuminati" is simply too mystical and to colorful to believe, especially when denigrated by the towering intellects "who don't believe in conspiracy theories." The term "International Zionist bankers" offers a more believable base providing easier investigation and analysis. Any connections to these theories, even those supported by factual, hard evidence, are then pounced upon by the Zionist network of liars, frauds, dirt and smear mongers, journalistic charlatans and other propagandists, and are decried as examples of "frauds" and "forgeries." The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are, but of course, a "forgery." Never mind that they are on exhibit in the British Museum the curators are obviously too stupid and have been duped. And "Hitler's bankers" are another fraud. And Israel's attack on the U.S.S. Liberty never happened, and 34 of our Navy personnel weren't really killed in that act of war. Everybody else is lying, but never the Zionists. They never lie or persecute or discriminate against anyone. That is why they need "hate crimes" protection! MacDonald seems to have fallen into the same Zionist trap that befalls most critics of "Judaism." Let's think about that for a moment. Let's reflect for a moment on Hitler's views of the "Jewish bankers" who betrayed Germany via the Versailles Treaty. Let's reflect upon Mel Gibson's outburst while in an inebriated state blaming all the world's wars on "Jews." How about Henry Ford in his Zionist "451"-banned book, The International Jew? It can be shown that "Jews" were clearly identified as being heavily involved in both initiating World War I and in cutting up all the pieces of the Versailles victory pie for themselves. To be sure, "Jews" presided over both the beginnings of World War I, as well as in its spoils, one of them being the guarantee of a "Jewish state" in the captured Ottoman territory identified as Palestine. But were these "Jews" really Jews, or were they in fact Zionists? Failing to separate the two designations is what discredits Hitler, Ford, Gibson, Lindbergh, Mearsheimer, Walt, Judt, Freedman, and now probably even former President Jimmy Carter. I fear that the genre of "conspiracy theory" dismissal rhetoric offered by such as Professor MacDonald, misses badly on the real driver that should be at the heart of any discussion involving the international political future of our planet. And the driving force of world politics is not, nor has it ever been, Judaism. The threat is Zionism! It has always been Zionism, and will continue to be such unless we stop their current dangerous stooge, G. Bush, from launching World War III. Our unelected Chief Executive Moron has his finger on the button, and the Zionists, not neoconservatives, are the puppet masters pulling his strings. Towering intellects and celebrated American philosophers of note will tell you that they simply don't believe in "conspiracy theories." Brilliant! The secret beer hall cabal of Hitler socialists never rose to dominate Germany as the Nazis. And there was no conspiracy in baiting the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. And JFK, RFK, and JFK, Jr., are all just coincidences of bad luck. And Enron never happened. And Oklahoma City never happened. And 9/11 never happened. These are all just "theories." If you are on a railroad track in the dark, and someone warns you that a train is rapidly approaching you from the rear, do you challenge them by calling them a fool, or do you at least turn to look? Dismissing, therefore, the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," is a serious mistake, and as the free world might soon learn, may translate as well into a fatal one as well. By using the same selective methods attributable to our Zionist, mainstream establishment corporate media, let's just examine the more relevant sections of the Zionist's bible and detailed plan of action. There are, of course, a myriad of pertinent tactics to be found therein, tying in neatly to an overall strategy design for world dominance and control. Yet, all of these Protocols should rightfully be deemed foolish as well as totally impossible considering the excellent arguments of Professor MacDonald in citing the total improbability of a "monolithic" Jewish conspiracy. But as Professor MacDonald dismisses both a Jewish conspiracy and the Protocols, he fails to connect to both the astonishing and staggering power of the Zionist international banking cabal. The massive power MacDonald fails to consider is the largest wealth and power base in the world. It is this international wealth and power that controls virtually all governments of the world. It is the House of Rothschild-Rockefeller international bankers. Considering the Protocols and their content is, of course, the highest possible insult to those of the Jewish faith. H.L. Mencken, who dismissed portions of the Talmud as pure anti-Christian filth and not to be taken seriously, would probably, in all likelihood, dismiss the Protocols as similar filth. But when one considers the proclivities of the House of Rothschild, to plot and incite wars, and then enjoy huge profits in financing ALL the belligerents, perhaps the Protocols are not that far-fetched. Of course, anyone that makes such analogy, or even demonstrates a modicum of curiosity as to what is stated therein, will simply be written-off as 'anti-Jewish' and 'anti-Semitic.' Their content is verboten! But what is really forbidden is it what is actually stated in the Protocols, more so than merely the desire to learn about them relative to the New World Order. When one studies all the wars since 1776, the year assigned as the beginning of the Rothschild world banking conglomerate that has existed for two centuries and has been expanded across Europe by the patriarch and his five sons, it has ultimately manifested itself globally in the Bank of England, the Bank of France, and the Bank of the United States of America deliberately misnamed "The Federal Reserve System." There is nothing either "federal" or "reserve" about our Rothschild-created "national bank." President Andrew Jackson stopped a bullet fired at him by a Rothschild assassin, hired to kill him for his monumental efforts in saving America from the international criminal plot via the establishment of a "national bank" for America. Both Jefferson and Jackson agreed that such a bank would ultimately destroy our nation. It has also been speculated, and strongly played down as well, that when the "real" Abraham Lincoln launched his war and invasion of the South at the behest of northern industrialists, Lincoln, rebuffed by the "New York City" [Zionist] bankers in refusing to underwrite bond loans to the Union to finance the war, printed his own "greenbacks" thereby avoiding Zionist control of our money system. The New York banks wanted to create "debt money" financed by interest rates as high as 24 to 36 percent. But Lincoln's war was financed by the clever bond marketing program created by "money man" Jay Cooke. Here is how The First American-The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin author, H.W. Brands, diplomatically puts it in his book, The Money Men-Capitalism, Democracy, and the Hundred Years' War Over the American Dollar: "Chase [Samuel, U.S. Treasurer] invited Cooke to join him in appealing to the financial communities of New York and Boston in the same way Cooke had appealed to Philadelphia. Boston cooperated readily enough, but New York was a hard sell. Throughout the war New York would be notorious for its apathy at times violent apathy toward the war effort; this shortfall of Union patriotism was exacerbated in the financial community by the international connections of many of New York's bankers, whose foreign partners had no emotional stake inAmerica's fight." Brands' description is totally factual, but offering that the Rothschilds "had no emotional stake in America" is pure unadulterated nonsense! The Zionist banking conglomerate was rooting for the Confederacy, which had already been printing its own money. Two Americas would be easier to convert to the Zionist banking scheme than one powerful free and independent nation that could print its own money without them. Lincoln printed his own greenbacks and Chase was able to extort some financial support from the New York Zionist bankers by threatening to "bury them in paper" and inflate their holdings. This was done without Rothschild supervision or their granting of debt money "credit." Lincoln was assassinated, and there are strong indications that the Zionists were behind that act of terrorism, considering as well the attempt on President Andrew Jackson's life. In addition to the Zionist threat from inside the nation via the New York bankers, Tsar Alexander II of Russia was also having problems with the Rothschild international banking criminals. Alexander II saw through the Rothschild plot for carving up America into two pieces to cash in, and immediately dispatched his fleet to provide Lincoln naval support to prevent the Rothschild manipulation of our "Civil War." The Rothschild's remembered this, and almost half a century later, Jacob Schiff, the America-based Rothschild banker of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, would finance the Japanese in the Japanese-Russian war eventually leading to the destruction of the Russian fleet that protected America from the Rothschild takeover of our money system. And although President William McKinley can be faulted for his imperialistic flaws in declaring war upon Spain to steal the Philippines and Cuba, at least he didn't knuckle under to the Zionist international Rothschild bankers either doing their bidding. McKinley, too, was assassinated. The turmoil created by the 1905 Japanese-Russian War, the loss of the fleet, and Zionist-generated labor union unrest brought down the Christian monarchy inRussia. Along with the chaos created during and after World War I, the Zionists, through their plot of enforced communism via the Bolshevik Revolution that was also engineered by them, created the Soviet Union, and led to the massacre of millions of Christians. As Professor MacDonald has pointed out, "communism is a product of 'Jewish' intellectualism." When JFK became our president, one of the first actions he took was to fire Alan Dulles the then-head of the CIA. The Bush family-created intelligence bureaucracy and partner of the Mossad, is said to have been very instrumental in changing JFK's motorcade route in Dallas on the date of his assassination. Dulles and his brother, John Foster, were the lawyers hired by the international Zionist Rothschild bankers to write the Versailles Treaty, the latter bringing into existence Hitler and his Nazis. JFK actively sought to block the most dangerous Zionist nation in the world from obtaining nuclear weaponry and thereby vigorously opposing the desires of then-Israeli Prime Minister Ben-Gurion. And it didn't help JFK either when he made it clear that he opposed the Zionist banking system in America. JFK was assassinated as well, the same fate of Lincoln and McKinley, and the attempt to kill Andrew Jackson. The foregoing cited incidents of Zionist banker meddling in our own internal affairs is offered only to provide a very abbreviated back drop of the sordid and long list of Zionist plotting resulting in major upheavals in our American way of life. A review of the astonishing wealth of the Rothschilds and their investments in gold, silver and diamond mining, and their international notoriety in starting wars via their ownership of all news and information media the world over, is testimony to their total control over virtually all governments in the world, including especially our own. Most informed individuals already know about their trademark of funding both sides of the numerous wars they "invested" in, but not too many know that they also usually started the wars they financed. Such was indeed the case with World War I, when their total control of French, British and American newspapers was brought into play to incite "bottoms up" public pressure, and also to mobilize political "tops down" public official and bureaucratic action in response to their continual agitation for wars. Here is an excerpt from the FIRST PROTOCOL. Think of it as it may relate to our "elected" president and our Congress: Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men whom we wanted we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man; and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyze initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities. And here's an excerpt from the TWELFTH PROTOCOL concerning the press/media: We shall handle the Press in the following manner: 1. We shall saddle it and keep tight reign upon it. We shall do the same also with other printed matter, for of what use is it to rid ourselves of attacks in the Press, if we remain exposed to criticism through pamphlets and books? [Think Internet and "hate crimes.] 2. Not one announcement will reach the people save under our supervision. We have attained this at the present time to the extent that all news is received through several agencies in which it is centralized from all parts of the world. 3. Literature and journalism are two most important educational forces, and consequently our government will become the owner of most of the journals. If we permit ten private journals, we shall organize thirty of our own, and so on. This must not be suspected by the public, for which reason all the journals published by us will be externally of the most contrary opinions and tendencies thus evoking confidence in them and attracting our unsuspecting opponents, who thus will be caught in our trap and rendered harmless. Think of their control of international banking and the governments of the world via their national banks, their International Monetary Fund, and their World Bank. From the TENTH: To wear everyone out by dissensions, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculation of diseases, want, until the Gentiles see no other way of escape except an appeal to our money and power. And from the SIXTH: We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, colossal reservoirs of wealth, upon which even the big Gentile properties will be dependent to such an extent that they will all fall together with the government credit on the day following the political catastrophe. The economists here present must carefully weigh the significance of this combination. We must develop by every means the importance of our super-government, representing it as the protector and benefactor of all who voluntarily submit to us. And their DIVIDE and CONQUER methodology of instigating wars from the FIFTH: A world coalition of Gentiles could cope with us temporarily, but we are assured against this by roots of dissension among them so deep that they cannot be torn out. We have created antagonism between the personal and national interests of the Gentiles by arousing religious and race hatreds which we have nourished in their hearts for twenty centuries. And from the SEVENTH: To each act of opposition we must be in a position to respond by bringing on war through the neighbors of any country that dares to oppose us, and if these neighbors should plan to stand collectively against us, we must let loose a world war. It was not the intent here to list all 24 protocols. Nor was it the intent here to be "anti-Semitic" or anti-Jewish. The intent here should be clear: to make the distinction between Zionism as a political threat and divorce it from the religious faith that is Judaism. Are there Jews that support Zionism? Of course! But I would like to offer that there are far more "Christian Fundamentalists" believing in "end times" salvation who wrongfully and unjustly equate Zionism and Judaism as one and the same. Compare even this abbreviated list of their tactics incorporated in their strategy of world dominance. Now consider the wealthiest entity on Earth: the Zionist bankers of the House of Rothschild-Rockefeller. Can the make the New World Order happen? How does their agenda stack up to realities concerning the Bush-doting media controlled by them? Why do they support Bush? Why doesn't Congress stop Bush, stop the war in Iraq, and block him and Israel from attackingIran? Do the excerpts from the Protocols answer any of these questions? The Internet bypasses the Zionist owned and operated media, which is why Hillary needs a gatekeeper for US. And the Internet can and does substitute for "pamphlets and books." Think of that "Founding Document" that was most responsible in generating "bottoms-up" pressure from the Colonists. Wasn't it Tom Paine's "Common Sense"? And therein lies the threat to Zionism. "Net neutrality" will be attacked, "hate crimes" legislation introduced, and we will then be the enemies of our own government created to serve US. It's the Zionist way! Source: Rense.com
http://www.ziopedia.org/content/view/3011/58/ |